CRIMINAL MATTERS

 CRIMINAL MATTERS
 GENERAL INFORMATION
 OUR SERVICE
PAYMENT METHODS
 CONTRACT FOR OUR SERVICES


GENERAL INFORMATION

Drunk driving, sometimes called driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving under the influence (DUI), has two meanings:
  • Driving with a blood alcohol level over the state’s maximum permissible blood alcohol limit. The limit varies from state to state, from 0.08% (in 15 states, including California) to 0.10%. The limit is even lower in many European countries, and in the United States, some states have imposed "zero tolerance" limits for young drivers. You may be considered "legally drunk" even though you do not "feel" or look as though you are under any "influence" from the alcohol. or
  • Driving when your physical abilities are impaired by drugs or a combination of drugs and alcohol. In the eyes of the law, it makes no difference that the drug is legal or illegal, prescription or over-the-counter. If taking that drug impacts your senses of seeing, hearing, talking, walking and/or judging distances, you may be guilty of a drunk driving offense.
Generally speaking, there are three kinds of evidence that a police officer will consider and gather in the investigation:
  • gross observations of behavior in general;
  • specific observations of balance tests and the like (usually called "field sobriety tests"); and
  • chemical test results of the motorist's blood, breath or urine.
A police officer may arrest a motorist if the cumulative effect of the evidence convinces the officer that he has "probable cause" or "reasonable cause" to make an arrest. This is a far lower standard than the one the state must prove at trial. There the case must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." Although this is a high standard, it is met every day in courts all over the country.
 
In most states, there are three ways of determining how much alcohol you have in your system: breath or blood (and in 8 states, including California, urine). Usually, you can choose which test you want to take.
 
If you choose breath, you will blow into a machine called a Breathalyzer that will determine the blood alcohol in your breath. Many jurisdictions permit you to have a second test and/or a blood or urine test. This is because a breath sample is not saved and so cannot later be re-analyzed by the defense.
Breath tests are the least accurate in determining the amount of alcohol you have in your system. This is because the breath machine assumes that the breath is from the lungs when it may be the alcohol residue still lingering from the mouth, esophagus, or the digestive system. If you belch, burp, hiccup, or vomit shortly before testing, or take a "breath freshener" (e.g., Binaca, Listerine), or cough syrups, you can bring vapor from alcoholic beverages still in the stomach up into the mouth and throat, registering an inaccurately high reading that would be used against you. Dental bridges and dental caps can also trap alcohol.
 
Analysis of a blood sample is potentially the most accurate, since it shows the presence of both alcohol and drugs. The least accurate and least reliable, by far, however, is urinalysis.
 
Thus, if you are confident that you are sober, a blood sample is the wise choice; urine, being least accurate and most easily impeached, is the best option if you believe your blood-alcohol concentration is above the legal limit.
 
There are a number of potential defenses that can be raised in a given drunk driving case. Roughly speaking, however, the majority can be broken down into the following areas:
  • "He wasn’t driving". Intoxication is not enough: the prosecution must also prove that the defendant was driving. This may be difficult if, as in the case of accidents, there are no witnesses to you being the driver of the vehicle. Most drivers quickly admit they were driving, although they had the right to remain silent.
  • Probable cause. Evidence will be suppressed if the officer did not have legal cause to (a) stop, (b) detain, and (c) arrest. Sobriety roadblocks present particularly complex issues.
  • Miranda. Incriminating statements may be suppressed if warnings were not given at the appropriate time.
  • Implied consent warnings. If the officer did not advise you of the consequences of refusing to take a chemical test, or gave it incorrectly, this may affect admissibility of the test results -- as well as the license suspension imposed by the motor vehicle department.
  • "Under the influence". The officer's observations and opinions as to intoxication can be questioned -- the circumstances under which the field sobriety tests were given, for example, or the subjective (and predisposed) nature of what the officer considers as "failing". Witnesses can testify that you appeared to be sober.
  • Blood-alcohol concentration. There exists a wide range of potential problems with blood, breath, or urine testing. "Non-specific" analysis, for example: most breath machines will register many chemical compounds found on the human breath as alcohol. And breath machines assume a 2100-to-1 ratio in converting alcohol in the breath into alcohol in the blood; in fact, this ratio varies widely from person to person (and within a person from one moment to another). Radio frequency interference can result in inaccurate readings. These and other defects in analysis can be brought out in cross-examination of the state's expert witness, and/or the defense can hire its own forensic chemist.
    Testing during the absorptive phase. The blood, breath or urine test will be unreliable if done while you are still actively absorbing alcohol (it takes 45 minutes to three hours to complete absorption; this can be delayed if food is present in the stomach). Thus, drinking "one for the road" can cause inaccurate test results.
  • Retrograde extrapolation. This refers to the requirement that the blood-alcohol concentration be "related back" in time from the test to the driving (see following discussion on "BAC defense"). Again, a number of complex physiological problems are involved here.
  • Regulation of blood-alcohol testing. The prosecution must prove that the blood, breath, or urine test complied with state requirements as to calibration, maintenance, etc.
  • License suspension hearings. A number of issues can be raised in the context of an administrative hearing before the state's department of motor vehicles.

    DUI PUNISHMENT TABLE (Click Here)

 


OUR SERVICE

FULL REPRESENTATION
($300 Retainer Plus $225 Per Hour)
Our attorney fee agreement for criminal matters provides for the payment of a $300 retainer plus $225 per hour with a minimum fee of $1,000. The minimum fee must be paid in advance.


PAYMENT METHODS:

 CREDIT CARD
- VISA, MASTERCARD,
AMERICAN EXPRESS-
  • Bring your card to the office or;
  • Include your credit card information on our questionare or;
  • Call us with the information.
CHECK,
MONEY ORDER
Mail you check or money order with your questionare and attorney fee agreement.


TO RETAIN OUR SERVICES:

 BY FAX
(562) 596-0298
  • Print out our questionare and attorney fee agreement
  • Fax it to us at (562) 596-0298.
  • Either include your credit card information on the questionare or give it to us over the phone or mail us a check.
BY PHONE APPOINTMENT (562-596-8177)
Call us to make a phone appointment with an attorney. He/she will take the information necessary to prepare the agreement over the phone and make arraingments for payment.
 E-MAIL (KinseyE@ix.netcom.com)
  • Download our questionare and attorney fee agreement as a text file.
  • Complete and E-Mail the documents to us at KinseyE@ix.netcom.com
  • Either include your credit card information on the questionare or give it to us over the phone or mail us a check.
 SNAIL MAIL
  • Print out our questionare and attorney fee agreement
  • Send it to us via snail mail with your check or credit card information. (Send to Kinsey Law Offices, 323 Main St., 2nd Floor, Seal Beach, CA 90740)
 IN-PERSON APPOINTMENT
If you are close to our office in Seal Beach, make an appointment to see one of our attorneys.


 TOP